The Chartered Governance Institute - Irish Region

Irish Region

Read the Insurance update in the Irish Agenda on the European Commission's view on the insurance block exemption regulation.

European Commission reaches preliminary view that insurance block exemption regulation is no longer necessary

The European Commission has published a review of the Insurance Block Exemption Regulation (IBER), which expires on 31 March 2017. The Commission’s preliminary view is that the IBER is no longer necessary.

The IBER allows (re)insurers to benefit from an exemption to the application of competition law rules to two types of agreements between (re)insurers which meet certain criteria. This means that such agreements benefit from a presumption of compliance with competition law. The two types of agreements are:

  • First, (re)insurers may jointly compile and distribute information needed for costs calculations and the construction of mortality tables (but not share the calculations or mortality tables themselves). The Commission considers that a specific block exemption is no longer required for these activities, noting that its 2010 Guidance on Horizontal Co-operation provides relevant guidance on information exchange. The Commission has stated that if required, it could also provide complementary specific guidance.
  • Second, (re)insurers may participate in co-insurance and co-(re)insurance pools. The Commission notes that there is an industry trend away from the use of institutionalised pools towards more flexible ways of co-(re)insuring risks and that few industry participants have made use of this element of the IBER in practice.

The Commission will issue final proposals on the IBER in early 2017.

Central Bank publishes report on money laundering in the life insurance sector

Further improvements suggested to strengthen AML/CTF framework of insurers

In March 2016, the Central Bank published a report setting out its observations and expectations in relation to Anti-Money Laundering, Countering the Financing of Terrorism and Financial Sanctions (AML/CFT) compliance by Irish life insurers (the Report).

Carried out over the course of 2014 and 2015, the Report was based on a combination of on-site inspections and desk-top reviews which involved the assessment of insurers’ related policies, procedures, risk assessments, outsourcing and third-party arrangements together. The Report also encompassed interviews with key staff, walk-throughs of key processes and testing of relevant IT systems conducted by the Central Bank.

The Report recognises that although the inherent AML/CFT risk may be lower in the insurance sector than in other sectors, insurers should be aware that there are products, customers and geographic regions that present a higher AML/CFT risk.

Main areas of concern identified

The Report concluded that in many instances, insurers generally had satisfactory procedures and systems and controls in place. However, a number of the issues identified indicated that that further improvements should be made by insurers to strengthen their existing AML/CFT framework. The findings of the Report focus on customer due diligence (CDD), suspicious transaction reporting, terrorist financing, financial sanctions, and compliance and governance centred on the importance of robust board oversight and record keeping.

The Report identifies the following main areas of concern:

  • Non-adherence to the stated AML/CFT policies
  • Weaknesses in the suspicious transaction reporting process
  • Deficiencies in the ongoing customer and transaction monitoring processes
  • Insufficient evidence of adequate data collection as required under the Criminal Justice (Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing) Act 2010
  • Insufficient documentation being retained to support the application of simplified customer due diligence
  • Weaknesses in the suspicious transaction reporting processes and procedures and in the on-boarding process of politically exposed persons
  • Insufficient evidence that all members of the insurer's board and/or staff had received instruction in the law relating to AML/CFT issues
  • Deficiencies in the policies and processes in place relating to third party reliance and outsourcing arrangements
  • Failure to fully consider, qualify or document the criteria and process for the identification, recording, and application of Enhanced Due Diligence to high risk policyholders.

Central Bank recommendations

The Central Bank expects that insurers maintain a detailed suite of AML policies which are supplemented by guidance and supporting procedures that fully demonstrate compliance with all legal and regulatory requirements. The Report also points out that these policies should be reviewed and updated accordingly.

In addition, the Central Bank expects that insurers conduct and document an AML risk assessment of their business including all risk categories (e.g. geographic risk, product/service risk, policyholder risk and channel/distribution risk). If any gaps are identified, it is expected that an action plan should be put in place to address such gaps and such plans should be reviewed and approved by the board at least annually. 

Search CGI